Tort Duties of Landowners: A Positive Theory
نویسنده
چکیده
One of the most controversial areas of modern tort law is that of the duty of landowners toward people who visit their land. The common law divided land visitors into three types: invitees, licensees, and trespassers. The highest duty of care was owed to the invitee and the lowest to the trespasser. The distinctions led courts to hand down harsh decisions and to draw formal lines between the categories that seemed to defy common sense at times. This paper explains the incentive-based function of the classical landowner duties. I will argue that the classical duties served useful regulatory functions. The most important was regulating the overall scale of injuries by imposing the risk of latent defective conditions in property to the party who is most likely to be aware of the risk or to take action to avoid the risk. ∗ Honorable Paul J. Liacos Professor Law, Boston University, [email protected]. This paper was prepared for the Wake Forest Law School conference on the Restatement (Third) of Torts. I thank Haoqing Zhang for research assistance.
منابع مشابه
Epstein's Tort Theory: a Critique
IN three articles published in this journal between 1973 and 1975, my colleague Professor Richard Epstein set forth an ambitious normative theory of tort law.' Among the distinctive features of this theory were the author's insistence that strict liability based on causal principles should be the prima facie standard of liability, that notions of liberty rather than of economic efficiency shoul...
متن کاملModularity and Morality in the Law of Torts
Tort law presents a puzzle from an information cost point of view. Like property, its duties often avail against others generally, but unlike property it is appears not to be standardized and is more subject to judicial innovation. This essay argues that torts, like property, employs modular structures to manage the complexity of interactions between actors. Both property and torts solve the in...
متن کاملAttractive Nuisance: a More Flexible Approach
'RESTATEMENT, ToRTS §§ 334-339 (1934)'Id. § 333. 'Sioux City & Pac. R.R. v. Stout, 84 U.S. (17 Wall.) 657 (873), was the first case to articulate the doctrine in this country, although the Court cited two, Connecticut cases, Birge v. Gardiner, 19 Conn. 507 (1849) and Daley v. Norwich & W.R.R., 26 Conn. 591 (1858), and Lynch v. Nurdin, I QB. 29, 113 Eng. Rep. 1o41 (141), as "authorities" for its...
متن کاملمفهوم خطا و نقش آن در ساختار طبقه بندی مسئولیت مدنی
Concept of delict(Tort) in Roman Law on the base of Deontology as a ethical theory is recognized in the concept of breach of first Duty and structure of category in this legal system is formed on the base of Obligation and Responsibility as a secondary of breach of first Obligation.in contrast in Common Law and Jurisprudence, concept of Tort in accordance to ethical theory of teleology is...
متن کاملLiability of Using Prescribed Fires on Forestlands and State Legislation Evolution
Escalating wildfires on forestlands in recent years have resulted in statutory changes in redefining the liability for landowners in using prescribed fires. This study summarized these reforms in recent years. While in some states there is still strict tort liability for damages from prescribed fires, eighteen states have reduced the liability burdens on landowners with simple negligence rules,...
متن کامل